video!!!

Charles Jackie

:Seperator bar Lower

E-mail-Courriel: oldmaison@yahoo.com
News - Stories and Rants

Friday 6 May 2016

Fredericton Blogger Charles LeBlanc Says No To Signing Peace Bond



By André Faust The Left Eye

Blogger Charles Leblanc refused to accept signing a peace bond which would bind him to “Be of good behavior”. According to Leblanc he has no choice but to refuse because he has seen too many times where the Fredericton city police has used violation of peace bond to arrest those in poverty and those who are aboriginals. The concept keeping good behavior is so broad that almost any behavior could be interpreted as contrary to keeping good behavior. Leblanc, because of his negative past experience with the Fredericton city police is quite sure that if he signs the peace bond the Fredericton City Police would use the broad definition of peace bond to have him lock up.

The offer that was given to Leblanc is that if Leblanc signed a peace bond to have no contact with Andrew Spencer and be of “good behavior” for six months the summary charge of assault on Andrew Spencer the charge against Charles Leblanc would be dropped. Leblanc said that he had some while back signed and order that he would “be of good behavior”. Promises were made to him at that time if he signed the peace bond. Once he signed the peace bond the Fredericton City Police and the Crown renege on their promise. The three days later his apartment was raided by the Fredericton City Police. As a result of Leblanc’s past experience with the Fredericton City Police he has no confidence or Trust in the Fredericton City Police.

Failure of blogger to sign the peace bond agreement the crown opted to proceed to trial.

At the trial Andrew Spencer testified that he was upset about Charles Leblanc doing an interview with a child without the parents’ consent, and that Charles was using children to benefit from them. When Spencer saw Leblanc on July 3rd, 2015 he decided to Confront Leblanc and let Leblanc know  his displeasure on this matter. During the confrontation Spencer say’s Leblanc took off his glasses then hit him on the right side of his jaw causing him to pivot 270 degrees an fall to the ground.

Crown Witness Constable John Lally was called to the stand where he told the court that he noticed a slight reddening of the jaw. Defence lawer Mathieu Boutet asked Lally if it could have been caused by anything else, Lally response was yes, but the injury is consistent with Spencer’s complaint.

Defence witness Terry Wishart description of the event is that Spencer crossed kings street shouting at Mr. Leblanc, once he crossed the street started to argue aggressively waving his hands in front of Leblanc. Leblanc at that point removed his glasses, at one point Spencer reached for Leblanc’s face and that is when Leblanc struck Spencer in the face causing Spencer to fall to the grown, when Spencer got up he yelled at Charles “Is that all you’ve got!”. Wishart explains that he and Charles walked away from Spencer leaving Spencer screaming and hollering.

The final witness to be called up to the stand was Charles Leblanc, in his testimony he said that Spencer came across the street yelling and came up to him telling him that it was not right to video children to put on his blog without the parents’ permission, and that he was using the children to benefit himself.

 
Andrew-Spencer
Artist Conception: Andrew Spencer
Artist: Emma Leigh
Leblanc told the court that during the altercation Spencer was aggressively swinging his hands in front of his face. Being proactive LeBlanc removed his glasses. Crown Prosecutor Sebastien Michaud question LeBlanc’s motive for removing the glasses, LeBlanc reiterated the reason that he removed his glasses was because two weeks earlier in a similar situation he was assaulted by panhandler Mike Gaudette, Leblanc did not want to take a chance to have a repeat of the previous week, because he could not afford to buy a new pair if his glasses were to be broken. Leblanc continued to explain that he repeatedly told Spencer to leave. Spencer thrusted his hand towards Leblanc face and hit Leblanc’s cap that is when Spencer was struck in the face. Moments flowing the punch Leblanc told the court that he and Wishart walked away from Spencer.

In the closing arguments to the court Crown Prosecutor Sebastien Michaud argued that Leblanc was actually enticing Spencer when LeBlanc said hit me, hit me and when Spencer turn away that is when Leblanc sucker punched Spencer, this is not self defence striking a person when their back is turned.

Leblanc’s defence lawyer Mathieu Boutet argued that Spencer was on a mission to confront Leblanc about his dissatisfaction about a video that Spencer only partially saw, in addition there is no evidence of a sucker punch.

After hearing the arguments from the crown and the defence. Judge Julian Dickson told the court that he will render a verdict on June 29th, 2016 at 13:30hr.


11 comments :

  1. Good outline of the trial, its also available as twitter feeds at the CBC report. I like how the crown argues that it can't be self defense if you take your glasses off! And what is the point of signing a peace bond to stay away from a guy who runs across the street after you.

    That the government is wasting so much time and resources on this is an embarassment. With the witness the facts speak for themself and I suspect the only reason the judge needs to 'mull it over' until June 29th is that they didn't want to openly admit that the police and crown were wasting money in a bankrupt province. The courts use such terms as 'reasonable', and Mr. Spencer had a 'red mark' which was only barely visible. Its not like Mr. Leblanc beat the tar out of him. And given Spencer's conduct, that amount of force is pretty 'reasonable'.

    ReplyDelete
  2. He admitted that he punched him in the face. Leblanc was in no danger and there was no threat. IN fact the glasses argument shows that he was getting ready to fight. He could have simply walked away.

    He's guilty, no question about it.

    ReplyDelete
  3. If you go up to somebody and start screaming at them and then gesture towards them (like taking a hat) then they are under no obligation to wait and see if you're going to stick a knife into them or break your nose. The law says if YOU are reasonable thinking its a threat, then you are justified. If Charles had hit him repeatedly then its another story entirely. But one punch that is barely discernable when a known crackhead comes at you is certainly not assault.

    ReplyDelete
  4. You can use force if it is reasonable in the circumstance and the only option. Should have walked on this one. I'm thinking you should have taken the peace bond, looking like a guilty verdict Charlie Boy.

    ReplyDelete
  5. I was at the trial - what a farce. It started two hours late seemingly because LeBlancs own lawyer tried to beat him down to sign a peace bond. Word is defence counsel called in the Crown prosecutor to harass Charles into signing the peace bond as well - whoa, that doesn't smell right. I have never seen such a pitiful excuse for a trial. No hard evidence was entered and no case law provided, leaving a corrupt judge to do whatever he pleases. Well done Charles, for not signing a piece of paper that would be a court order admitting your guilt for something you did not do and would enable the FP farce to throw you in jail any time they want, for farting downtown.

    ReplyDelete
  6. That is a great sketch Emma. You got Spencer!

    ReplyDelete
  7. "You can use force if it is reasonable in the circumstance and the only option."

    It doesn't have to be the 'only option'. Even during a robbery there is the option of getting short.

    The legal criteria is that the response has to be proportional to the crime, and actually very few self defense are successfully prosecuted. In this case, charles did not beat or attack him, he simple punched when he was reached at. If that is 'assault', some people have a bizarre notion of assault.

    George Zimmerman is acquitted of 'assault' after murdering Treyvon Martin-who was unarmed, who Zimmerman thought 'looked suspicious', after saying "these assholes always get away with it", and after being told that the police were on their way.

    Charles Leblanc, barely hits a drug addict who comes down the road screaming at him and who reaches out at him. Yeah, welcome to Wonderland Alice.

    ReplyDelete
  8. WELCOME TO HAZARD COUNTY, FOLKS, DA DUKE BOY'S Vs. DA LAW. NOW, WHO DA HELL DO YA THINK IS GONNA WIN DIS. WHY, THE ONLY ONE MISSIN' IS PRETTY LITTLE DAISY DUKE HERSELF.. SHAME, SHAME!!!!

    ReplyDelete
  9. Thars plenty of Daisy's round capital county, just wait til it warms up dude!

    ReplyDelete
  10. You mean the defense counsel that was hired by Charles was even out to get him?

    That's rich!

    ReplyDelete
  11. Time to fire the police chief for all the $$$ spent on harassing Charles.

    FYI Charles saved us over $5,000,000.00 in Pension increase that the liberals voted for themselves that was later reversed by the Conservatives and all because of the efforts of Charles.

    What is his reward. More harassments from police chief.

    She needs to be FIRED. Fire the Police chief.

    Motto you never know if the lawyer works for you or the police chief.

    Great job in not signing that crap of bullshit paper.

    Lets see if the new mayor & councillors have the balls to fire Leanne or are they also at the mercy of the police chief?

    ReplyDelete