News - Stories and Rants
Thursday 15 January 2015
Wednesday 14 January 2015
Blogger is going to take it easy!!!
I was going to go at the Police Station today or tomorrow to press an assault charge against the idiotic Poet Andrew Spencer but I decided to take it easy.
I know the Justice System is corrupt and especially racist against the less fortunate.
I replayed and replayed the confrontation I had on July 3rd when the drunken so-called Poet confronted me on the streets in Fredericton.
I don't know the guy but I will admit that it was scary.
My God...Immigrants were running away from this drunken lunatic before he came after me.
In a year from now? I will be laughing at this saga.
I'm going to take it easy and see what they say in the disclosures...
I know the Justice System is corrupt and especially racist against the less fortunate.
I replayed and replayed the confrontation I had on July 3rd when the drunken so-called Poet confronted me on the streets in Fredericton.
I don't know the guy but I will admit that it was scary.
My God...Immigrants were running away from this drunken lunatic before he came after me.
In a year from now? I will be laughing at this saga.
I'm going to take it easy and see what they say in the disclosures...
Police are protecting the Idiots!!!!
Charles,
I just read a guy in NB was charged after his place west of Saint John was broken into in the night, 2 guys and a girl..he struggled with one guy, ended up shooting the break in bandit in the leg and hes charged??
Thats fucked up totally..
I just read a guy in NB was charged after his place west of Saint John was broken into in the night, 2 guys and a girl..he struggled with one guy, ended up shooting the break in bandit in the leg and hes charged??
Thats fucked up totally..
Special Crown Prosecutor Sebastien Michaud will give Disclosure to Blogger in the morning!!!
Took long enough....sighhhhhh
Then we will know who is behind these false accusations....lets not forget that someone from the Crown Prosecutor Office accuse me of exploiting kids for Sex exactly three years ago Monday!!!
I never went against the Crown prosecutor as I did with the Public Safety Minister but something is VERY odd in this charge.
I might add that I don't have the rights to a Lawyer....
One thing is certain...the issue of the Fredericton Police Force will be debated during the trial. Maybe we finally can get some answers because the drunken Lunatic Poet Andrew Spencer confronted me and accuse me to be a Pedophile.
Truly stay tuned.....
Then we will know who is behind these false accusations....lets not forget that someone from the Crown Prosecutor Office accuse me of exploiting kids for Sex exactly three years ago Monday!!!
I never went against the Crown prosecutor as I did with the Public Safety Minister but something is VERY odd in this charge.
I might add that I don't have the rights to a Lawyer....
One thing is certain...the issue of the Fredericton Police Force will be debated during the trial. Maybe we finally can get some answers because the drunken Lunatic Poet Andrew Spencer confronted me and accuse me to be a Pedophile.
Truly stay tuned.....
Quebecois Dan Bussieres not leaving???
Heard the News last night...The Government renewed his contract for another 5 years I guess?
Can anyone confirm this????
Can anyone confirm this????
Will Fredericton Police have their wish on Monday morning at 9:30am in the Justice Building????
This is SO WRONG but we must asked the question - How many other people have this happened to????
Someone from the Crown Prosecutor is going out of their way to set up these bogus chrge against me.
Are these the same people who accuse me of exploiting Kids for Sex???
Lots of issues going on but can't say in here....will bring it up Monday morning!!!
Racism against the less fortunate? Of course it is!!!! We need a Provincial Inquiry against this Racist Agenda!!!
The Debate continues.....
By André Faust
In an unprecedented move by law enforcement, Social Activist Charles Leblanc was given a court date to enter a plea on and assault charge without receiving a notice to appear. This information was reported by Irving’s Canada East court reporter Don Macpherson, Macpherson writes; Blogger to appear in court on summary assault charge at 9:00am on January 19, 2015.
What is extremely bizarre is Charles LeBlanc was never given a notice to appear from the police or any court officials yet a court date has been scheduled.
I spoke with Charles and as of 8:00 pm on January 7th 2015 Charles hasn’t received any documentation from the courts or the police requiring him to appear on January the 19th. This is quite unusual, even for a trivial offense such as riding a bicycle without a safety helmet the enforcement officer issues a notice/promise to appear which is contained in the ticket and if the person does a no show than a warrant for their arrest will be issued.
In Macpherson’s article published on January 6th in the Daily Gleaner, Macpherson make no reference to who is laying the charge, so it is not known whether it’s the Miramichi Police Force or the crown who filed the charge against Leblanc, because Macpherson has not mention who laid the charge, one can’t rule out that the story may be a fabrication.
If the story is accurate the implication is that a person can be given a court date to answer to the charge without their knowledge. Common sense tells that the likely hood of non-appearance is pretty high if they have not been formally given notice to appear in court. What happens, are they arrested and detained for failing to appear?
This would appear to be contrary to the intent of our charter of rights, which is pretty scary stuff when you consider that people can be arrested and put in jail because they failed to attend their court date because haven’t been given an appearance notice. Once this issue is resolved, either for or against Blogger Charles, the public should be told how much it cost to get this low level offense into court, and in addition a comparative cost this action with other summary assaults that the courts have heard over the years.
The onus is on the crown to prove that Charles is guilty beyond a reasonable doubt, if the crown fails, and Charles is found guilty, then one can only conclude that the courts found him guilty to justify the high cost of bringing Charles to trial.
4 Responses Mordaith, on January 9, 2015 at 18:30 said: Andre. Dude. Not cool. I had a great deal of respect for you up until this point. Macpherson is a stand up journalist. Who has only treated Charles with the fairness and respect he not only deserves but has asked for. Seriously? Making a comment that he may have made it all up? Do you know how you rule that stuff out? You know before you possibly slander a man and bring his professional credentials in to question? You ask him. Or you ask the cops. You check the facts. A simple phone call to the court, the police, or hell even the news paper could have illuminated this situation. Maybe you should really take a good firm look at how to check this information out, learn how to report on issues, before you start shooting at the hip with your itchy trigger finger against the first ‘evil corrupt Irving baddie’ you can find. You probably have no idea who I am. But I consider my self and old friend of Charles. And I had a large amount of respect for you until I read this. Shame on you. This kind of knee jerk reactionary writing is exactly the fodder that the big companies and the other powers that be need to continue to discredit left leaning people who value critical thinking.
Reply lefteyex, on January 9, 2015 at 21:29 said:
In response to your argument. I re-read the commentary, and I could not find anything that could be construed as an attack on Don MacPherson person nor did I find anything derogatory references about Don. The only thing that I could see was the comment “one can’t rule out that the story maybe a fabrication”, but I didn’t say nor suggested that it was Don who fabricated the story. The context was, where Don Macpherson omitted to mention his source, then one cannot rule out rule out the likely hood that the information that he provided may have been fabricated. Later in the commentary it did say “if the story is accurate”. The faux pas that Don MacPherson did, is, he reported that the accused was charged with an offense and the date of the court appearance before the accused was notified that they were being charged with an offense, Charles Leblanc was served with a summons to appear in court on the 19th of January which is two days later after Macpherson’s story, but that doesn’t exonerate the fact that the Daily Gleaner published prematurely the court date before Charles received his summons to appear. I have made several inquiries to see if is common practice for media to publish Charges being laid and the appearance date without the accused having prior knowledge that they were being charged. From my query it does appear that is not common practice for media to “Put the cart before the horse”. If you can show me explicitly that the commentary is not factual, I will re-evaluate the story, and if you are correct I will take the responsible action to remedy it, while I appreciate your feedback on the commentary, I stand by my commentary as is. – André Faust Reply
Mordaith, on January 10, 2015 at 00:40 said:
“In Macpherson’s article published on January 6th in the Daily Gleaner, Macpherson make no reference to who is laying the charge, so it is not known whether it’s the Miramichi Police Force or the crown who filed the charge against Leblanc, because Macpherson has not mention who laid the charge, one can’t rule out that the story may be a fabrication.” Seems pretty clear, to myself, and other who read this, that you implied Don made it up. And if you are trying to ‘spin’ it any other way, you are just as bad as the same people you criticize. Changing your narrative, claiming context and inference when what you meant was pretty darn clear. Shame on you Andre. I’m seriously disappointed. Consider yourself down one reader.
Reply Margret Leaky, on January 11, 2015 at 02:34 said:
I read the story the was published in the Daily Gleaner. I didn’t find any inaccuracies in Andre’s story. As far as fabrication, given the relationship that charlie with the justice system, it would be possible for someone to make something up just to discredit “The Blogger”
To be fair...Here's the Irving story -
DON MACPHERSON Fredericton Daily Gleaner Share this article January 5, 2015 Charles LeBlanc, a controversial blogger in Fredericton, will appear in court Jan. 19 to answer to a charge of summary assault.
Photo: Stephen MacGillivray/The Daily Gleaner archive
A controversial blogger and anti-poverty activist is set to appear in court later this month to answer to an assault charge.
Charles Joseph LeBlanc, 55, of 1-145 Westmorland St., Fredericton, faces a summary charge of assault, alleging an assault on Andrew Spencer in downtown Fredericton on July 3.
While the incident is alleged to have occurred in Fredericton, the city police force had asked an outside agency – the Miramichi Police Force – to investigate the complaint.
LeBlanc’s first appearance on the assault charge is scheduled for the morning of Jan. 19.
The Daily Gleaner reported last fall the Miramichi Police Force was investigating an assault complaint at the Fredericton force’s request, and LeBlanc confirmed he was the focus of that investigation.
LeBlanc has a tumultuous history with police officers in Fredericton.
He’s been arrested, convicted and sentenced for causing a disturbance, stemming from a one-man bullhorn protest at the police station.
The city police also investigated him for criminal libel, but that didn’t lead to a charge.
The provincial Attorney General didn’t approve the charge as the relevant section of the Criminal Code of Canada had been found to be unconstitutional.
City hall paid for an independent review of how the city police handled that libel investigation, which involved the police seeking information from LeBlanc’s Internet service provider.
A document filed with the provider that indicated the police were seeking evidence in the libel probe also referred to a search for evidence of a child-exploitation offence.
The police force said that was a clerical error, but LeBlanc doesn’t accept that explanation.
On his blog, he referred to members of the Fredericton Police Force as pedophiles, though he’s never had any evidence to back up those claims.
Those allegations led city chief administrative officer Chris MacPherson to file a complaint with Google, which owned the free online service on which LeBlanc’s blog was hosted.
The city official requested that posts on the blog that referred to officers as pedophiles be removed. Google opted to remove the entire blog.
LeBlanc has since launched a new blog at the same hosting service.
In an unprecedented move by law enforcement, Social Activist Charles Leblanc was given a court date to enter a plea on and assault charge without receiving a notice to appear. This information was reported by Irving’s Canada East court reporter Don Macpherson, Macpherson writes; Blogger to appear in court on summary assault charge at 9:00am on January 19, 2015.
What is extremely bizarre is Charles LeBlanc was never given a notice to appear from the police or any court officials yet a court date has been scheduled.
I spoke with Charles and as of 8:00 pm on January 7th 2015 Charles hasn’t received any documentation from the courts or the police requiring him to appear on January the 19th. This is quite unusual, even for a trivial offense such as riding a bicycle without a safety helmet the enforcement officer issues a notice/promise to appear which is contained in the ticket and if the person does a no show than a warrant for their arrest will be issued.
In Macpherson’s article published on January 6th in the Daily Gleaner, Macpherson make no reference to who is laying the charge, so it is not known whether it’s the Miramichi Police Force or the crown who filed the charge against Leblanc, because Macpherson has not mention who laid the charge, one can’t rule out that the story may be a fabrication.
If the story is accurate the implication is that a person can be given a court date to answer to the charge without their knowledge. Common sense tells that the likely hood of non-appearance is pretty high if they have not been formally given notice to appear in court. What happens, are they arrested and detained for failing to appear?
This would appear to be contrary to the intent of our charter of rights, which is pretty scary stuff when you consider that people can be arrested and put in jail because they failed to attend their court date because haven’t been given an appearance notice. Once this issue is resolved, either for or against Blogger Charles, the public should be told how much it cost to get this low level offense into court, and in addition a comparative cost this action with other summary assaults that the courts have heard over the years.
The onus is on the crown to prove that Charles is guilty beyond a reasonable doubt, if the crown fails, and Charles is found guilty, then one can only conclude that the courts found him guilty to justify the high cost of bringing Charles to trial.
4 Responses Mordaith, on January 9, 2015 at 18:30 said: Andre. Dude. Not cool. I had a great deal of respect for you up until this point. Macpherson is a stand up journalist. Who has only treated Charles with the fairness and respect he not only deserves but has asked for. Seriously? Making a comment that he may have made it all up? Do you know how you rule that stuff out? You know before you possibly slander a man and bring his professional credentials in to question? You ask him. Or you ask the cops. You check the facts. A simple phone call to the court, the police, or hell even the news paper could have illuminated this situation. Maybe you should really take a good firm look at how to check this information out, learn how to report on issues, before you start shooting at the hip with your itchy trigger finger against the first ‘evil corrupt Irving baddie’ you can find. You probably have no idea who I am. But I consider my self and old friend of Charles. And I had a large amount of respect for you until I read this. Shame on you. This kind of knee jerk reactionary writing is exactly the fodder that the big companies and the other powers that be need to continue to discredit left leaning people who value critical thinking.
Reply lefteyex, on January 9, 2015 at 21:29 said:
In response to your argument. I re-read the commentary, and I could not find anything that could be construed as an attack on Don MacPherson person nor did I find anything derogatory references about Don. The only thing that I could see was the comment “one can’t rule out that the story maybe a fabrication”, but I didn’t say nor suggested that it was Don who fabricated the story. The context was, where Don Macpherson omitted to mention his source, then one cannot rule out rule out the likely hood that the information that he provided may have been fabricated. Later in the commentary it did say “if the story is accurate”. The faux pas that Don MacPherson did, is, he reported that the accused was charged with an offense and the date of the court appearance before the accused was notified that they were being charged with an offense, Charles Leblanc was served with a summons to appear in court on the 19th of January which is two days later after Macpherson’s story, but that doesn’t exonerate the fact that the Daily Gleaner published prematurely the court date before Charles received his summons to appear. I have made several inquiries to see if is common practice for media to publish Charges being laid and the appearance date without the accused having prior knowledge that they were being charged. From my query it does appear that is not common practice for media to “Put the cart before the horse”. If you can show me explicitly that the commentary is not factual, I will re-evaluate the story, and if you are correct I will take the responsible action to remedy it, while I appreciate your feedback on the commentary, I stand by my commentary as is. – André Faust Reply
Mordaith, on January 10, 2015 at 00:40 said:
“In Macpherson’s article published on January 6th in the Daily Gleaner, Macpherson make no reference to who is laying the charge, so it is not known whether it’s the Miramichi Police Force or the crown who filed the charge against Leblanc, because Macpherson has not mention who laid the charge, one can’t rule out that the story may be a fabrication.” Seems pretty clear, to myself, and other who read this, that you implied Don made it up. And if you are trying to ‘spin’ it any other way, you are just as bad as the same people you criticize. Changing your narrative, claiming context and inference when what you meant was pretty darn clear. Shame on you Andre. I’m seriously disappointed. Consider yourself down one reader.
Reply Margret Leaky, on January 11, 2015 at 02:34 said:
I read the story the was published in the Daily Gleaner. I didn’t find any inaccuracies in Andre’s story. As far as fabrication, given the relationship that charlie with the justice system, it would be possible for someone to make something up just to discredit “The Blogger”
To be fair...Here's the Irving story -
DON MACPHERSON Fredericton Daily Gleaner Share this article January 5, 2015 Charles LeBlanc, a controversial blogger in Fredericton, will appear in court Jan. 19 to answer to a charge of summary assault.
Photo: Stephen MacGillivray/The Daily Gleaner archive
A controversial blogger and anti-poverty activist is set to appear in court later this month to answer to an assault charge.
Charles Joseph LeBlanc, 55, of 1-145 Westmorland St., Fredericton, faces a summary charge of assault, alleging an assault on Andrew Spencer in downtown Fredericton on July 3.
While the incident is alleged to have occurred in Fredericton, the city police force had asked an outside agency – the Miramichi Police Force – to investigate the complaint.
LeBlanc’s first appearance on the assault charge is scheduled for the morning of Jan. 19.
The Daily Gleaner reported last fall the Miramichi Police Force was investigating an assault complaint at the Fredericton force’s request, and LeBlanc confirmed he was the focus of that investigation.
LeBlanc has a tumultuous history with police officers in Fredericton.
He’s been arrested, convicted and sentenced for causing a disturbance, stemming from a one-man bullhorn protest at the police station.
The city police also investigated him for criminal libel, but that didn’t lead to a charge.
The provincial Attorney General didn’t approve the charge as the relevant section of the Criminal Code of Canada had been found to be unconstitutional.
City hall paid for an independent review of how the city police handled that libel investigation, which involved the police seeking information from LeBlanc’s Internet service provider.
A document filed with the provider that indicated the police were seeking evidence in the libel probe also referred to a search for evidence of a child-exploitation offence.
The police force said that was a clerical error, but LeBlanc doesn’t accept that explanation.
On his blog, he referred to members of the Fredericton Police Force as pedophiles, though he’s never had any evidence to back up those claims.
Those allegations led city chief administrative officer Chris MacPherson to file a complaint with Google, which owned the free online service on which LeBlanc’s blog was hosted.
The city official requested that posts on the blog that referred to officers as pedophiles be removed. Google opted to remove the entire blog.
LeBlanc has since launched a new blog at the same hosting service.
Tuesday 13 January 2015
Why is informant Andrew Spencer protected by the Fredericton Police????
Charles,
Maybe Andrew is an informant. That would explain why the police did nothing when Andrew Spencer heckled the woman gathered for the "Take Back the Street" rally in front of Fredericton City Hall on September 19, 2014.
One of the organizers is trying to speak in the microphone over his yelling and says: "Is there anybody who would feel comfortable escorting this gentleman perhaps over to our police officer's car who could maybe address the profanity?
And then I am going to start again." The police did nothing.
Can we "Take Back Our Police Force"?
Fredericton Police rush to scene of 10 year old out of control!!!
This is insane!!!!
A 10 year old out of control < hitting the walls >and the first thing he's going to see are Cops???
Come on now??? What are these steroids Gorillas going to do??? Taze the little boy???
We know this little boy WILL NOT respect the Cops when he's older so we all know where his future is going to be located....sad...
UPDATE....Now the cops are called for a 4 year old???? FUCK!!!!!!!< excuse my humble language >
Lets not forget it's the same Cops that River Rat Matt Myers gave the orders to taze a 16 year old Autistic kid a few months back!
A 10 year old out of control < hitting the walls >and the first thing he's going to see are Cops???
Come on now??? What are these steroids Gorillas going to do??? Taze the little boy???
We know this little boy WILL NOT respect the Cops when he's older so we all know where his future is going to be located....sad...
UPDATE....Now the cops are called for a 4 year old???? FUCK!!!!!!!< excuse my humble language >
Lets not forget it's the same Cops that River Rat Matt Myers gave the orders to taze a 16 year old Autistic kid a few months back!
Monday 12 January 2015
Bathurst Police Officer Shoots Citizen at Via Rail Train Station in Bathurst in mistake Identity!!
Wife claims mistake identity????
I just left the area hours ago!!!...WOW!!!!!!
He was a Business Owner from Tracadie....:(
My God....Maybe they were looking for me????..orders form the Fredericton Police Force???
I seen the close up pictures...scary stuff...
Racists Members of the Fredericton Police Force driving the less fortunate to their Grave!!!!!
Accusing the less fortunate to exploit children for Sex...hoping they might commit suicide... Time for the Province of New Brunswick to have a open Public Inquiry on the Witch hunt being done by the Fredericton Police against the less fortunate!!!
Fredericton Police to order Saint John Police to give ticket to Clifford Jesso in Saint John???
No bicycle helmet.....why not?..The same happened to me when they gave me a ticket 9 days after Dan Bussieres made a complaint that I was riding a bicycle on the sidewalk!!!!
Je suis Charlie is not respected in Fredericton New Brunswick!!!!
'
Fredericton Mayor Brad Woodside DOES NOT support Je suis Charlie!!!
Subscribe to:
Posts
(
Atom
)