I noticed the Irving Media are really pushing the Image of the Fredericton Police Force in their local paper.
I just don't get it!!! The cops must have something on the Irvings??? But what????
Here's a video from the CBC -
It's issues like this that tells me that we need good honest Journalists in the Irving's media.
Of course, I was distracted by the fire at my place and Christmas came and went.
But seriously? Why would a Newspaper agree that fooling the internet provider with fake child porn search warrant is a good thing???
Are the Irvings working together with the Police???
We need a good Watergate Team of journalists to investigate this issue!!!
Many questions? How came up with the idea to search my place for child porn??? Who suggested this???
The David Alward's Government? Dan Bussieres???? Which individual in the Police Force gave the orders???????
How many citizens are in Jail because of this Crooked Police Force?????
Take a look at this part of the report AGAIN -
Here's the part they lied -
Just as concerning is that in its efforts to obtain information from Mr. LeBlanc’s Internet Service Provider (ISP), the FPF used a request form that is reserved for requests pertaining to child sexual exploitation offences. This is such a blatant misrepresentation of the nature of the investigation that we requested a response from the ISP as to why they provided the information asked for since the title of the form used had been modified to state that it pertained to a libel investigation. Below is their response:
The form is designed for the purposes of facilitating disclosure of subscriber information linked to an IP address for child sexual exploitation offences only and is used by law enforcement agencies across Canada to request subscriber information linked to an IP address from various internet service providers. It appears to me in this case that the officer from Fredericton Police has modified the template version of this form indicating in the title section that the investigation is with respect to libel. The section below that, however, clearly indicates the investigation being undertaken is related to child sexual exploitation.
Given that the form is intended for the purpose of this type of disclosure and the form also indicates is it [sic] required for this purpose, [we] subsequently provided the subscriber information with the understanding is [sic] was intended to be used for that purpose. My team would not use this form to disclose IP address information under any other circumstances. All other types of non-exigent criminal investigations require the police to obtain a production order or search warrant to obtain subscriber information linked to an IP address.
This egregious error gives credence to those who see this part of the investigation as an attempt to find something more serious to be used against Mr. LeBlanc.
Obviously, several members of the FPF were questioned about the use of this form. The response provided was that it was a "poor cut and paste job." But, with respect, it is more than that given that
the use of th the form is exclusive to child sexual exploitation offences and should only be used for that purpose.
The only possible alleviating consideration to be given for this "poor cut and paste job" is the inevitable conclusion that a search warrant requested for the same purpose would have undoubtedly been approved and this would have met the ISP’s policy concerning release of personal information. All other requests to or through the Crown to obtain the necessary evidence, including a search warrant to enter Mr. LeBlanc’s premises and seize his computer, were approved. There is no reason to believe that a request to obtain Mr. LeBlanc’s IP address would have received a different treatment.
We need some answers and I'm going giving up until I get some!!!!!
