News - Stories and Rants
Tuesday 5 July 2016
Monday 4 July 2016
The Fredericton Rat Patrol almost cut me off twice today!!!
They were hunting down the less fortunate today...twice they almost cut me off but I just kept on going...we need a Cop to give me a ticket and fight this issue in court!!!!!
We must find out the names of these wants be racist Cops???
We must find out the names of these wants be racist Cops???
Fighting for the RIGHTS of Autistic Adults in New Brunswick!!!
Made this video last week...I didn't even know about this one....
Sunday 3 July 2016
Saturday 2 July 2016
Friday 1 July 2016
Happy Canada Day but in Fredericton is it a happy day???
The Citizens are finding out we will in a Police State...not good...:( but Happy Canada Day anyway!!!
Self-representation the results would have been different – Charles Leblanc
By André Faust (The Left Eye)
After almost two grueling years of a legal battle the Charles Leblanc
case ends with a verdict of not guilty of committing the offence of
summary Assault against busker Andrew (Muppet) Spencer on July 3rd 2014.
It appears that the Fredericton City Police used Mr. Spencer as a pawn to accomplish their dastardly vendetta against the blogger. Friends for justice seen that if Charles Leblanc self represented himself, the chances were extremely high that he would not be able to convince the court of his innocence.
It appears that the Fredericton City Police used Mr. Spencer as a pawn to accomplish their dastardly vendetta against the blogger. Friends for justice seen that if Charles Leblanc self represented himself, the chances were extremely high that he would not be able to convince the court of his innocence.
Friends for justice created a crowdfunding web page to finance
Charles’ defence, the Charles Leblanc defence fund raised over 4,000$
and was able to retain Moncton Lawyer Mathieu Boutet to successfully
defend Blogger Charles Leblanc.
This case raises questions about the inadequacy of the legal aid system in New Brunswick that will not provide legal council to those who are financially disadvantage to defend themselves against a summary conviction offence. Not have access to legal representation places the defendant in a precarious position, to either plead guilty or represent themselves in court with a slight chance of winning their case.
This case raises questions about the inadequacy of the legal aid system in New Brunswick that will not provide legal council to those who are financially disadvantage to defend themselves against a summary conviction offence. Not have access to legal representation places the defendant in a precarious position, to either plead guilty or represent themselves in court with a slight chance of winning their case.
Thursday 30 June 2016
Final Day for Maudit Calice de Quebecois Richard Tremblay!!!
This was from a Bureaucrat who received all kinds of warning from Maudit Quebecois!!!
lol
To all my Supporters!!! I say - MERCI BEAUCOUP!!!!
I haven't blog much after the verdict...I believe I was just mentally drain!!!!
To my Friends and Anonymous donors....this would have never been possible if it wasn't for you to donate money!
But we must focus on the many innocent who are in Jail because they were denied a lawyer. The Crooked members of the Fredericton Police Force MUST be investigated.
Police Chief Leanne Fitch IS NOT taking this issue seriously and MUST resign!!
She hired Shane Henderson as a member of the Force!!!
I will wait till after the weekend and filled a complaint on the manner this was handle.
Lots of lies in this case and Sgt River Rat Matt Myers wanted me charge for aggravated assault!!!
I might add they ONCE AGAIN labelled me as a pedophile and this is not right!!!
Once again!!! Thank You to my supporters!!! < You know who you are >..:)
Wednesday 29 June 2016
Tuesday 28 June 2016
The verdict of my Trial comes Tomorrow < Wednesday > afternoon at 1:30pm!!!!
TRULY STAY TUNED!!!!
By André Faust The Left Eye
By André Faust The Left Eye
Blogger Charles Leblanc refused to accept signing a peace bond which would bind him to “Be of good behavior”. According to Leblanc he has no choice but to refuse because he has seen too many times where the Fredericton city police has used violation of peace bond to arrest those in poverty and those who are aboriginals. The concept keeping good behavior is so broad that almost any behavior could be interpreted as contrary to keeping good behavior. Leblanc, because of his negative past experience with the Fredericton city police is quite sure that if he signs the peace bond the Fredericton City Police would use the broad definition of peace bond to have him lock up.
The offer that was given to Leblanc is that if Leblanc signed a peace bond to have no contact with Andrew Spencer and be of “good behavior” for six months the summary charge of assault on Andrew Spencer the charge against Charles Leblanc would be dropped. Leblanc said that he had some while back signed and order that he would “be of good behavior”. Promises were made to him at that time if he signed the peace bond. Once he signed the peace bond the Fredericton City Police and the Crown renege on their promise. The three days later his apartment was raided by the Fredericton City Police. As a result of Leblanc’s past experience with the Fredericton City Police he has no confidence or Trust in the Fredericton City Police.
Failure of blogger to sign the peace bond agreement the crown opted to proceed to trial.
At the trial Andrew Spencer testified that he was upset about Charles Leblanc doing an interview with a child without the parents’ consent, and that Charles was using children to benefit from them. When Spencer saw Leblanc on July 3rd, 2015 he decided to Confront Leblanc and let Leblanc know his displeasure on this matter. During the confrontation Spencer say’s Leblanc took off his glasses then hit him on the right side of his jaw causing him to pivot 270 degrees an fall to the ground.
Crown Witness Constable John Lally was called to the stand where he told the court that he noticed a slight reddening of the jaw. Defence lawer Mathieu Boutet asked Lally if it could have been caused by anything else, Lally response was yes, but the injury is consistent with Spencer’s complaint.
Crown witness Terry Wishart description of the event is that Spencer crossed kings street shouting at Mr. Leblanc, once he crossed the street started to argue aggressively waving his hands in front of Leblanc. Leblanc at that point removed his glasses, at one point Spencer reached for Leblanc’s face and that is when Leblanc struck Spencer in the face causing Spencer to fall to the grown, when Spencer got up he yelled at Charles “Is that all you’ve got!”. Wishart explains that he and Charles walked away from Spencer leaving Spencer screaming and hollering.
The final witness to be called up to the stand was Charles Leblanc, in his testimony he said that Spencer came across the street yelling and came up to him telling him that it was not right to video children to put on his blog without the parents’ permission, and that he was using the children to benefit himself.
 | |
| Artist Conception: Andrew Spencer Artist: Emma Leigh |
Leblanc told the court that during the altercation Spencer was aggressively swinging his hands in front of his face. Being proactive LeBlanc removed his glasses. Crown Prosecutor Sebastien Michaud question LeBlanc’s motive for removing the glasses, LeBlanc reiterated the reason that he removed his glasses was because two weeks earlier in a similar situation he was assaulted by panhandler Mike Gaudette, Leblanc did not want to take a chance to have a repeat of the previous week, because he could not afford to buy a new pair if his glasses were to be broken. Leblanc continued to explain that he repeatedly told Spencer to leave. Spencer thrusted his hand towards Leblanc face and hit Leblanc’s cap that is when Spencer was struck in the face. Moments flowing the punch Leblanc told the court that he and Wishart walked away from Spencer.
In the closing arguments to the court Crown Prosecutor Sebastien Michaud argued that Leblanc was actually enticing Spencer when LeBlanc said hit me, hit me and when Spencer turn away that is when Leblanc sucker punched Spencer, this is not self defence striking a person when their back is turned.
Leblanc’s defence lawyer Mathieu Boutet argued that Spencer was on a mission to confront Leblanc about his dissatisfaction about a video that Spencer only partially saw, in addition there is no evidence of a sucker punch.
After hearing the arguments from the crown and the defence. Judge Julian Dickson told the court that he will render a verdict on June 29th, 2016 at 13:30hr.
Subscribe to:
Posts
(
Atom
)