News - Stories and Rants
Sunday, 5 October 2014
Saturday, 4 October 2014
Is the New Brunswick Legislature more secure than the White House????
Charles,
The White House. THE most secure acre of real estate known to man. AUTHORIZED PERSONEL ONLY!!!! Anyone else will be SHOT DEAD!!!!It don't leave a helluva lot of room for error, Charlie, when it comes to personel in absolute and extrermely high degrees of security and those who would resort to some sort of hanky-panky, hooliganism or out 'n out TERRORISM!!!! And not only are we in the era of post-9/11-ism, pal, we also happen to live in a period of history where we have an African-American president.
And on top of all of this, Charlie, we hear that some low-life, good-fer-nuttin' jackass, who probably takes great pride in associating himself with al-qaeda, ISIS or some other form of absolute terrorism, manages to escort himself , not only through the White House doors, but deep into the inner sanctuaries, the East Room. and God only knows where else, before they brought him down by the balls. I mean, for the LUVVA GOD, man, if this sort of escapade can be perpapetrated under the very noses of the highest security this universe has to offer, jist imagine what an absolute cinch it would be to gain access to the New Brunswick legislature. COME POLICE, COME!!!! ARREST HIM, ARREST HIM!!!!
LUV YA BOOBIE!!!!
Did Google have a right to eliminate the Blog????
Charles,
You are as foolish as Mikel but that seems to be because you are Mikel - you write jsut like him, caps and all. You say freedom of speech is not protected on this site because the government doesn't own it!!! You seem to be saying only government sites protect freedom of speech, which is garbage. Google do indeed seem to have infringed Charles' right to free speech and stole his intellectual property. They did not only remove the allegedly offensive posts, they removed everything Charles created, including many informative and public interest stories. For other very offensive bloggers Google removes only the complained of posts but they treated Charles differently and stole over 20,000 posts, of which only a very small number were possible offensive. By the way, sorry to disappoint you but I have never been convicted of anything and have witness many people suffer incredibly at the hands of our very corrupt establishment. 10:25 - you really sound like Mikel with a hangover.
You are as foolish as Mikel but that seems to be because you are Mikel - you write jsut like him, caps and all. You say freedom of speech is not protected on this site because the government doesn't own it!!! You seem to be saying only government sites protect freedom of speech, which is garbage. Google do indeed seem to have infringed Charles' right to free speech and stole his intellectual property. They did not only remove the allegedly offensive posts, they removed everything Charles created, including many informative and public interest stories. For other very offensive bloggers Google removes only the complained of posts but they treated Charles differently and stole over 20,000 posts, of which only a very small number were possible offensive. By the way, sorry to disappoint you but I have never been convicted of anything and have witness many people suffer incredibly at the hands of our very corrupt establishment. 10:25 - you really sound like Mikel with a hangover.
The Fredericton Police Constable Jeffrey Smiley Trial!!!
Time for a
Public Inquiry!
As an
observer of the two day trial of Constable Smiley, I can now only agree with
Charles – there must be a public inquiry into the waste of public money spent
on inept police and Crown prosecutors. The conduct of the entire Smiley case,
from lack-of-investigation and failed prosecution, showed the Fredericton City
Police never properly investigated the allegations against Smiley, and the two
RCMP officers were just as useless.
Our tax
dollars paid for Crown and defence counsel, two judges, court staff, the time
and resources of at least ten cops and for Smiley to be on endless unpaid
leave, plus cover for his shifts since February 2014.
The bottom
line is: the police witnesses confirmed repeatedly that Smiley’s girlfriend had
alleged around twenty similar incidents of what might be considered assault,
yet they only chose to charge and prosecute one allegation, without proper investigation,
and which did not even take place when the couple were in Fredericton City or
the Province of New Brunswick. The Information laid against Smiley was a sworn
statement that the police had “reasonable and probable grounds” to believe it
happened in New Brunswick.
Not one of
the ten, or more, police officers involved ever bothered to review all the
evidence materials until just one week before the trial, when they finally found
out the alleged assault happened in Nova Scotia, where the provincial police
and courts have no jurisdiction. If the cops had been diligent, they could have
asked the Nova Scotia police to take over the investigation, and lay charge
Smiley within the six month time limit for a summary offence.
Instead,
the Crown was forced to enter “no evidence” on the grounds of having no
jurisdiction at the beginning of the trial, on 1st October 2014,
leaving only the charge of breach of an undertaking. Cst. Smiley’s defence counsel,
T.J. Burke, also quite correctly stated that NB Chief Justice Lesley Jackson
himself had ruled that a charge of breach of an undertaking requires the charge that led to the breach to
be before the court. Once the original charge fails, then so must the alleged
breach. Burke also argued that Crown counsel had presented no evidence to prove
the guns complied with the Criminal Code of Canada description of a firearm. They
must be capable of firing and causing bodily harm. He was quite right.
As for the
complaint against Smiley: if only the Chief of Police and her Farce were as interested
in ordinary victims. Chief Fitch heard the allegation from her brother-in-law,
who heard it from his friend, who heard it from his daughter who lives next to
Smiley and his girlfriend. The neighbour and alleged victim were not brought in
to give evidence – quite obviously because their testimony would not stand up
to scrutiny.
Matt Myers
also testified that he and Smiley were not on good terms and had a very hostile
interaction. Interestingly, it was Myers who arrested Smiley for breach of the
undertaking, only ten hours after it had been signed, when Smiley had actually
gone to the police station to voluntarily hand the guns over.
The waste
of tax dollars in this matter was huge – and the question must be asked: since
the eight police witnesses repeatedly testified that they had been informed of
20 or so separate acts that might constitute domestic violence or assault, have
the police and Crown bungled a prosecution that leaves a serial abuser free to
carry on?
This “trial”
raises more questions than it answers, particularly about the incredible
incompetence of the Fredericton City Police, RCMP and Crown Prosecution
Services and lack of interest in their defective services by those legislated
to provide them – including the City council, Minister for Public Safety and NB
Police Commission. As with Charles’ unconstitutional charge under section 301,
the police had many ways to resolve the issues with Smiley – including properly
investigating. They rushed into charging and prosecuting, as usual, in what now
seems more like a personal vendetta against one of their own than genuine
criminal charges, prosecution and trial.
At the end
of the two day trial, Judge David Walker looked confused and is reserving his decision
until 2nd December. I am sure he was told to find Smiley guilty, and
not humiliate the useless police and Crown, but T.J. Burke played a good game.
The law is technically on his client’s side and Burke is laughing all the way to
the bank.
I am now
even more afraid of the FPF than any so-called criminals out there.
Thursday, 2 October 2014
Mikel a Rock Horse???
Oh Mikel, you just fail to understand the basics. The Fredericton City Police used fraudulent, criminal,defamatory and libelous accusations against Charles, to obtain evidence in support of a search warrant to enter his home, seize his equipment and shut down his blogsite to then falsely charge him with an unconstitutional, indictable, criminal offence carrying a five year jail sentence, and you wonder why Charles is angry? You, my son, have the brains of a rocking horse - driftwood - and you just seem incapable of understanding the extent to which the police went to lock him up and shut him down. The Fredericton City Police LIED and COMMITTED FRAUD to criminally charge a member of the public, under false pretenses. This repeated act by them was intentional, conspiratorial, abuse of process, breach of trust and an abuse of office - but you think Charles is the one with the problem.
This latest fiasco - shutting down his blogsite (which is theft of intellectual property and the right to free speech), and threatening him to remove evidence of municipal corruption, just confirms their agenda is the same - hiding corruption by the City and FPFarce regardless of the public interest. Mikel, you are a moron.
You don't seem to understand that New Brunswick has manipulated the law (including the Rules of Court in civil procedure) and created case law that is diametrically opposed to the constitutional rights of every Canadian. You haven't lived the lack of justice system in New Brunswick, so you should stop pontificating over what you clearly have no real knowledge or understanding of - or the lives it destroys.
Afghanistan Memorial Vigil in Fredericton!!!
Freedom is VERY important but I am very surprise that The soldiers came to the Fascist City of Fredericton???
I sure hope Council and the Police Force will not celebrate Remembrance Day this year....We don't need individuals who supports Fascism in this ceremony!!
Here's the youtube -
Wednesday, 1 October 2014
Anonymous Canadian Mothers message to ISIS!!!
P.S. If the Government tries to stop the Forestry Plan? They are open to litigation! However if the People stops supporting The Irvings? Then the Irvings will break their contract!!! Let the Boycott Begin!!!
Controversial blogger suing City of Fredericton for $60,000!!!!!
It wasn't in the paper because they post the story back in January but it was on their website!!!
I like this one because it goes into a few details....If I had a lawyer? It would be $600,000!!!!
Having the Fredericton Police telling the Public that I was exploiting kids for Sex is VERY damaging and the new Politicians at the New Brunswick Legislature will be confronted on this issue.
Too bad it was in the Irving paper because I guess this story was talked about on the radio this morning. I didn't knopw there were so many people who listens to the radio these days...:)
Controversial blogger suing City of Fredericton for $60,000
DON MACPHERSON Fredericton Daily Gleaner
September 30, 2014
Fredericton blogger Charles LeBlanc is suing the City of Fredericton for more than $60,000. He alleges in his statement of claim that the Fredericton Police Force sought retaliation after LeBlanc videotaped a controversial police takedown.
Controversial blogger and anti-poverty activist Charles LeBlanc is suing the City of Fredericton over what he claims is retaliation by the police force for his role in the prosecution of a constable.
LeBlanc filed a notice of action and statement of claim in the Court of Queen’s Bench in January, seeking damages in excess of $60,000.
He claims members of the Fredericton Police Force turned their attention to him after he recorded three officers using force to effect an arrest in the city’s downtown bar district in July 2009.
That video and other information led to the prosecution of Const. Stephen Stafford for assault, a charge of which he was acquitted in June 2011.
“The plaintiff contends that the Fredericton Police Force began to target him after the trial was concluded because of his incriminating video and corroborating testimony,” LeBlanc’s statement of claim says.
Go read the reast of the story on my facebook -
https://www.facebook.com/charles.leblanc.5437
I like this one because it goes into a few details....If I had a lawyer? It would be $600,000!!!!
Having the Fredericton Police telling the Public that I was exploiting kids for Sex is VERY damaging and the new Politicians at the New Brunswick Legislature will be confronted on this issue.
Too bad it was in the Irving paper because I guess this story was talked about on the radio this morning. I didn't knopw there were so many people who listens to the radio these days...:)
Controversial blogger suing City of Fredericton for $60,000
DON MACPHERSON Fredericton Daily Gleaner
September 30, 2014
Fredericton blogger Charles LeBlanc is suing the City of Fredericton for more than $60,000. He alleges in his statement of claim that the Fredericton Police Force sought retaliation after LeBlanc videotaped a controversial police takedown.
Controversial blogger and anti-poverty activist Charles LeBlanc is suing the City of Fredericton over what he claims is retaliation by the police force for his role in the prosecution of a constable.
LeBlanc filed a notice of action and statement of claim in the Court of Queen’s Bench in January, seeking damages in excess of $60,000.
He claims members of the Fredericton Police Force turned their attention to him after he recorded three officers using force to effect an arrest in the city’s downtown bar district in July 2009.
That video and other information led to the prosecution of Const. Stephen Stafford for assault, a charge of which he was acquitted in June 2011.
“The plaintiff contends that the Fredericton Police Force began to target him after the trial was concluded because of his incriminating video and corroborating testimony,” LeBlanc’s statement of claim says.
Go read the reast of the story on my facebook -
https://www.facebook.com/charles.leblanc.5437
Tuesday, 30 September 2014
Radio-Canada didn't do a good job covering the issue of the Blog being shut down!
I was VERY disappointed with Radio-Canada Journalist Michel Corriveau. < and I told him so the next day >
He said that the problems began when I filmed the Soldier.
That's true but I insisted that the real trouble began when I got the papers last March that the Cops went to my internet provider and told them that I was exploiting Children for Sex!!!!
Michel even allowed Wayne Tallon from Public Safety to tell the media that I was calling police officers - Pedophiles!!!!
Michel Corriveau NEVER showed this paper in his story!!!
Here's the Story -
He said that the problems began when I filmed the Soldier.
That's true but I insisted that the real trouble began when I got the papers last March that the Cops went to my internet provider and told them that I was exploiting Children for Sex!!!!
Michel even allowed Wayne Tallon from Public Safety to tell the media that I was calling police officers - Pedophiles!!!!
Michel Corriveau NEVER showed this paper in his story!!!
Here's the Story -
What do you think????
After 10 years, the Blogger finally got a phone...
I never bothered because I always told people to contact me via email!!!
Plus...I would love to know who's the FIRST BIG Idiot to sign a contract that he will pay for incoming calls???
So...scanner...tv...radio, computer and phone...this should keep my ADHD brains occupied!!!
:P
Plus...I would love to know who's the FIRST BIG Idiot to sign a contract that he will pay for incoming calls???
So...scanner...tv...radio, computer and phone...this should keep my ADHD brains occupied!!!
:P
Does Jon Stewart walks around with Body Guards???
I sure hope so since Isis said they were recruiting members within the United States.
The way this talk show host blast Isis, it sure would be a Coup D'Etat if they killed the popular Talk Show host.
I hope no harm on nobody but I didn't want to voice my views after the facts.
He's the best and he should be protected....
Monday, 29 September 2014
Subscribe to:
Posts
(
Atom
)