The Fredericton Irving Paper came out with a story and it's not that bad. I might add the Journalist Don MacPherson wasn't present at the beginning of the hearing.
He missed the part that I was denied the right to the Transcript. I believe it's VERY scary the less fortunate are not allowed to have access to the transcript especially to prove the Prosecutor LIED to the Court.
Sabastien Michaud told the court that I lied by saying that I didn't know this so-called idiot Poet???
This is the video he said I mentioned his name twice -
The video truly shows the idiot poet going after the citizen and the court might rule that he's allowed to lash out at the citizens in this City!!!!
15 supporters showed up in Court this morning < thank God it was raining! >...:P
Seriously, I appreciate the support in the Court Room and on the Streets.
As I always said - The system is on trial in this case. The Justice system is racist against the less fortunate and especially with people with mental illness.
Now....On September 18 the court want me to cross examine racist Cops River Rat Matt Myers and John Lally!!!
How can I stay calm knowing these assholes labelled me as a pedophile???
Their views will be posted shortly.....
Bottom line?..I NEED A LAWYER!!!
Here's a comment from a reader of the Irving Website to the story -
I'm not sure I understand this.
Let's see: Spencer sought out LeBlanc and confronted him over a possibly inappropriate video interview, things heated up and that resulted in a blow by LeBlanc on his confronter, Spencer.
City police seized upon this opportunity to avenge themselves on whistle-blower LeBlanc and requested the Miramichi police to help with the investigation.
The taxpayers of the City of Fredericton and the Province of NB are paying a fortune to try and convict an irritating blogger who should have got a fine to begin with.
Mr. Leblanc, Stop costing me money. Take responsibility for losing your temper and pay a fine.
City of Fredericton, identify the party responsible for this expensive investigation and fire them.
congratulations. now you know what it's like to put in a full days work.
ReplyDeleteHave lots of money my friend..But unfortunately looking at how you behave with others I have to wish in helping a guy like you. Good luck.
ReplyDeletestop misleading people Charles...you were NOT denied a transcript...you REFUSE to pay for it....Why should you be treated any different than any other person charged with something...you say you have money in your fund..use it and purchase what you need....just stop your continual lying.......
ReplyDeleteI want to know why spencer isn't on trial. harassment, verbal assaults and threatening behaviour. it isn't charles wasting the taxpayers money.
ReplyDeleteIf Spencer can go around accusing people of exploiting children for sex for financial gain and assaulting people on the street with his tirades, there may be a career in law enforcement for him yet! Policing for a penny.
ReplyDeletePolicing for a penny - I LOVE IT! I guess his Charter caution would be issued by poem, no choice of language - ooh ooh ooh I hope he uses iambic pentameter.
ReplyDeleteI was happy to contribute to the Defence Fund for Charles. He does a lot of good work helping the poor. Andrew Spencer never has. Spencer started screaming at Charles from across the street where Charles was talking to someone. Spencer crossed the street shouting and screaming at Charles. Anyone with half a brain would have seem Spencer as the aggressor.
ReplyDeleteWhat is wrong with the Legal System?
So the real question is did Charles hit Andrew Spencer with a closed hand. If so guilty. The rest is just a distraction on is not relevant at this time.
ReplyDelete21:07 It is so funny, one can spot a cop miles away.
ReplyDeleteCop? I think not. Funny how a simple question gets one accused of being a cop. Answer the question Charles did you hit him with a closed hand? That's a really simple question.
ReplyDeleteWhere's all your friends now Charles when you need money. Maybe you should get a real job and you can pay for a Lawyer
ReplyDeleteyou over look the obvious, what was the behaviours of parties that lead up to the alleged assault. It those behaviors that will determine whether Leblanc is found guilty. That is why Leblanc needs a lawyer to argue the defences that he has available to him. If the matter was as simple as striking with a closed hand or not a closed hand then when would need lawyers or judges. Mob mentality would suffice. Nothing like a good old fashion witch burning.
ReplyDeleteIt seems that every one forgets that in criminal law everyone is innocent till proven guilty, and the accused only has to show reasonable doubt. This principle applies to every one charged with a criminal offence, whether its Charles or and officer charged with drunken driving.