Maurice? Remind me to boot you up the arch next time I see you!!!!
Charles
Just like I said before, The more you go against Charles the more he will fight back and he will never stop no mater what. If you think he is bad now you should have seen him 20 or 30 years ago. What your seeing now is the very mellowed version of Charles.......believe it or not. The only way he will stop defending what he think is right is if you kill him.
So, Boobie, Lean Bitch, Dan Bustier, Loiseau, River Rat and all you that have spent years and made it a career of getting Charles......You wont win cause there is no quitting in that Scottish blogger.
My advice to you is to lay off Charles and move on with your life. He might do the same if your lucky.
He used to be friends with the fpd but he made the mistake of filming one of you beating the crap out of a innocent citizen. You have been trying to frame him ever since but you didn't succeed..
Dan Bustiere also was buddy with Charles, he even brought Charles to church with his family...then all of a sudden Charles is public enemy and gets banned from the leg? It maybe because of a rumor I heard that Dan's wife had the hots for Charles but I doubt that cause Charles is one ugly dude.
The thing is: If Dan would have left Charles do his thing Charles wouldn't have anything against him, he would have been a Dan Bustiere supporter but Dan has tried and tried to get Charles arrested what? a dozen times and has always failed.
Dan should just admit failure and just move on. He wouldn't have his ugly mug on Charles blog every day.
The fpd....same thing. Admit defeat and move on, You cant win with someone that wont quit. You all know that he wont quit so whatever you trow at him wont stick and you will end up looking like fools so make peace with the Scottish blogger and your life will be a hell of a lot better because as hard as it is to swallow...you wont win.
Charles wont quit so let him be. --maurice the homeless guy--
Only one correction to an otherwise excellent piece, is that Bussieres had Charles successfully arrested several times now.
ReplyDeleteNever convicted because its a B$ charge; but if Charles were allowed to stalk the leg grounds at will - no telling what crookery and outhouse shenanigans would be found.
Give em hell Charlie!
Well, again, so far so good, charles HAS 'quit' calling the police you know what, which unfortunately shows that in the worst cases you can't reason with Charles, you have to play hardball. That's too bad because it may mean someday they WILL try to sue Charles-you can sue people for money, but you can also sue people to change their behaviour.
ReplyDeleteCharles has shown in the past that he does have a sense of preservation, if he goes back to those nasty names, no doubt the city official will go back to its ways, probably do a form email to google to keep getting him shut down, or maybe even charge him with Section 300, which is probably warranted under that previous case.
But so long as Charles doesn't use that inappropriate word, then police can't complain. There are dozens of anti police blogs out there, although its true not many name specific officers the way charles does.
Its unfortunate its come down to this, in most part its because police are used to being able to do what they want and tend not to like to have to face any consequences-or any real accountability. Its really too bad there isn't a charles leblanc in every city in the country. I have serious doubts that the fredericton police has modified its behaviour to attend to all seven of those Bernard Richard recommendations-certainly the way the Police CHIEF responded to Charles shows that even the Chief hasn't had any training, let alone individual officers.
And its not rocket science, its how EVERYBODY is expected to function in our society, ESPECIALLY government (although ironically more often than not they are the last ones to do so). When you are wrong, you f&*^ing admit it. You don't issue an apology through media, you have the guts to face the person you wronged and you f*&^ing apologize. In this case they should have taken every officer to see Charles and filmed the damn thing. If the person is mentally ill, and all it costs you is an apology, then you do it. You don't act as immaturely or as 'mentally' as people we consider to have mental problems. All that does is show that even our institutions are 'mentally ill'-and thats FAR scarier than the fact there are mentally ill people out there (particularly when its the institutions who played a large part in making them that way-oh yeah, and their scottish genes:)
And when you are another officer in the force, or a mayor, or anybody else, you get out in public and denounce that behaviour, otherwise you tend to get tarred with the same brush.