The lawful grounds is that you signed an NDA on January 15th. You signed a legally-binding agreement. You break that agreement you are responsible for whatever happens to you afterwords.
You reap what you sow old man, and I hope the hole you dug yourself finally gets filled...with you in it
Oh dear, 16:26 is another idiot, who talks without knowing the law. The Supreme Court of Canada and Appeal courts across the land have confirmed in their rulings, which is equal to legislation, that any "contract" or agreement entered into, on fraudulent or misrepresented grounds, is a nullity in law. That included consent orders of the court and contracts of any kind. If Charles did not have legal counsel, and there is not law to support what he was co-erced into agreeing to, the "agreement" is a nullity in law. Also, without a court order, he isn't doing anything wrong in changing his mind. Anything related to this "PUBLIC" prosecution is the property of the public, other than to protect a minor or a vulnerable witness, which is not the case here. Go for it Charles - the public wants to know how our money is being wasted!
The public is paying the Crown - the disclosure is public property, especially since it is all going to be exposed in a trial. Go ahead Charles - this is tax dollars being wasted on crap, that is happening to more people than you. Get it on the court record then no-one can stop you.
Wow, comment at 16:26 sounds like a death threat... shocking that anyone could say something like wishing you get buried. Sick. You should not post comments like that, report them to the police - Oh, wait a minute, we have no real police and it's probably L'oiseau, commenting from wherever he went to...
I see you two have brown noses after kissing Charles' ass for so long.
An NDA is a legally binding agreement. To determine what is fraudulent or not must be determined by the courts themselves. NOT by a group of uneducated welfare hacks that think that the world is out to get them. If you don't have a judge declaring an NDA null and void, you will expose yourselves to much more legal danger than you are in.
Listen to your ass kissing crowd at your own risk old timer, I for one will laugh when you suffer legal consequences for this
It can only be government people publishing the nonsense about NDAs. An agreement based in fraud and misrepresentation is null and void. The Crown should not be hiding these papers - unless there is something to hide... which there obviously is. As a tax payer I want to see how my dollars are spent. if it is on persecuting people like Charles, then I want to know.
The lawful grounds is that you signed an NDA on January 15th. You signed a legally-binding agreement. You break that agreement you are responsible for whatever happens to you afterwords.
ReplyDeleteYou reap what you sow old man, and I hope the hole you dug yourself finally gets filled...with you in it
Oh dear, 16:26 is another idiot, who talks without knowing the law. The Supreme Court of Canada and Appeal courts across the land have confirmed in their rulings, which is equal to legislation, that any "contract" or agreement entered into, on fraudulent or misrepresented grounds, is a nullity in law. That included consent orders of the court and contracts of any kind. If Charles did not have legal counsel, and there is not law to support what he was co-erced into agreeing to, the "agreement" is a nullity in law. Also, without a court order, he isn't doing anything wrong in changing his mind. Anything related to this "PUBLIC" prosecution is the property of the public, other than to protect a minor or a vulnerable witness, which is not the case here. Go for it Charles - the public wants to know how our money is being wasted!
ReplyDeleteThe public is paying the Crown - the disclosure is public property, especially since it is all going to be exposed in a trial. Go ahead Charles - this is tax dollars being wasted on crap, that is happening to more people than you. Get it on the court record then no-one can stop you.
ReplyDeleteWow, comment at 16:26 sounds like a death threat... shocking that anyone could say something like wishing you get buried. Sick. You should not post comments like that, report them to the police - Oh, wait a minute, we have no real police and it's probably L'oiseau, commenting from wherever he went to...
ReplyDelete@ Anon 17:07 & 17:13
ReplyDeleteI see you two have brown noses after kissing Charles' ass for so long.
An NDA is a legally binding agreement. To determine what is fraudulent or not must be determined by the courts themselves. NOT by a group of uneducated welfare hacks that think that the world is out to get them. If you don't have a judge declaring an NDA null and void, you will expose yourselves to much more legal danger than you are in.
Listen to your ass kissing crowd at your own risk old timer, I for one will laugh when you suffer legal consequences for this
It can only be government people publishing the nonsense about NDAs. An agreement based in fraud and misrepresentation is null and void. The Crown should not be hiding these papers - unless there is something to hide... which there obviously is. As a tax payer I want to see how my dollars are spent. if it is on persecuting people like Charles, then I want to know.
ReplyDelete