For years I always get comments from these idiots cowards Jerkface. I strongly believe they are Cops playing the part as Trollers.
Here's one of them -
I wrote the fist phrase -
I am loved on Valentin Day!!!! -..:)
Anonymous has left a new comment on your post "Fredericton Police to grab and Jail Blogger during...":
Charles is an idiot who should be locked up in the nut house just to keep the public safe. Keeps going on about all his mental issues and that's why he can't work or why the legal system is hard to navigate for someone with his intellectual capacity and lack of income but yet he manages to run a blog and be productive all day. Of course he does it on the public teat so the working people are supporting his welfare fraud.
The cops should pick him up on a mental health warrant and send him away for a bit. The majority of Frederictonians would appreciate it.
1- lol "mental health warrant" imagine. Someone needs to do some reading.
2- you live rent free in that persons head
3- IF IT WASN'T FOR THE BLOGGER WE WOULDN'T KNOW WHAT WAS GOING ON IN THE CITY HE'S DOING NO HARM
4- Charles is a great guy, once you meet him you know he's a smart guy. I understand why he can't work, I can't either, only people dealing with mental issues will understand. I pay his wages with my taxes, that way people don't have to complain.
5- Love it when people don't have balls enough to sign their name. If your going to attack someone...grow some grapefruits and let everyone know who you are...keep up the good work Charles Leblanc
6- I happen to love the blogger gets the news out there without editing truth hurts some leave him
7- Hes not harming no one hes likes what hes does i love watching his blog and i wont stop watching keep up the good work Charles Leblanc
8 - Shame on the coward basher....that's also a mental illness not being able to face your fears ...should get help for that... keep up the great work Charles Leblanc
9- just because some people for what ever reason land on wlfare,that does not mean that we should not continue to try and contribute to society!!keep up the good work Charles and the haters please just go away and find something usefull to do with your life!!Charles has as well as many others!!
10 - course they had to remain anonymous, dam pussy
11- Iv been wanting to sharing this story for 2 weeks . My oldest son who is almost 14 is autistic. He once had a fear of ambulances, fire trucks and police . He has been doing well and almost had fear overcome ....... anyways I awoke at 6am and got my son up. He turned on his computer and went on YouTube. All of a sudden I heard sirens and a familiar voice. He was watching one of Charles videos. I said do you love Charles videos, he said yes. Thank u Charles for putting a smile on his face and keep those videos coming as he is watching them daily now.
12- Don't pay any attention to them...if they say who they are...they don't have any Guts to stand up for us people... Thanks Charles.
13- Charles u are loved by so many. Please focus on that ! U are a truth teller and a man who questions everything. I appreciate that u stop when I ask u too as well lol
14- as i said earlier if it wasn't for charles we wouldn't know what goes on in the city leave the guy alone he does no harm
15- Keep up da good work my friend n Happy Valentine's Day
16- The writer of those comments is very ignorant of mental health issues and our province's inadequate services in this area. Here's my Valentine's message to you, Charles: Thank you for your blog. Thank you for your inquiring mind and the information you provide. Thank you for all the work you did enlightening the public about the shale gas issue. I love how the news networks had to get coverage of the arrests up on the 116/126 from you! Happy Valentine's Day!
17- Keep that camera rolling, ,maybe it's someone in the department that wanted to give you a heads up! ! Your a smart man and always alert, ,you know you do have friends in high place's there looking out for you, ,I enjoy your video's and pictures keep up the good work Charles and happy valentine's day! !
18- Charles is using his time productively, he given his circumstances he could, drink beer, get drug fixes. Instead, he is out there. Could you imagine if other people in his same situation (income disability assistance) were challenging the system? Social changes would happen much quicker.
Using Charles phrase "those coward jerkfaces" had any F$%ken intelligence. they should be able to figure out what unemployment means. you have 10 jobs, and 15 not working, if one of the 10 loses their job the 1 of the 15 will get a job for those with limited analytical skills it would look like there is work a plenty.
Unless there are new jobs created, if anyone gets a job it means someone has lost a job, eig, death, retirement, health, quit.
There is also another aspect to it the employer who have work but no one will work for him/her. When that happens, it is usually justified. We call them shit employers, who don't give a rats ass about their employee's, they tend to create working conditions that are worse than when Charles Dickens was alive and kicking.
I have an associate, who thirty years ago told me the secret of his business is to find people who are in a state of desperation because they will work for peanuts and you don't have to provide anything to them, in terms of safety, and optimised working conditions relative to the job. According to him/her, you can work the hell out of these people, and when they burn out you just replace them with another desperate.
Back to Charles, Charl does have his own unique style of blogging, I have often said his style of blogging is reminiscent of the Jerry Springer show. Charles has produced both, shit work, and excellent work.
From my observations, Charles has gained both the recognition and respect from another journalist.
Charles has a big advantage over mainstream media, he doesn't have the to depend on advertising revenue. That allows him to be aggressive in his questioning that the other journalist doesn't have the luxury, for that journalist, that aggression would mean the loss of revenue.
Back in the seventies, there was a rag called the Plain Dealer a local weekly that was similar to what Charles does. The weekly would cover stories that at times was not complementary to some business and government departments. However, the weekly had an extremely high circulation rate in the City. Because the Plain Dealer was so critical it lost it's advertisement revenue which led to its demise.
The Plain Dealer had its own printing press, For those young, enough they were located where the old Capital theatre was located across from the bank of Montreal adjacent to kings place. The dealer had 5 some reporters and writers, several press operators.
Because of they critical of the power elites in Fredericton they lost their revenue. With Charles, they can not do that.
The only way shut Charles down (at least Temporarily) is to find him guilty of some offence and sentence him for a couple of months.
Why is so much money, human resources and so on that is being spent on Charles? The bottom line it's to shut him up.
Keep up the good work Charles, get the information out there and let each individual decide on the quality of the content.
If he can survive the forces that have unlimited human and financial resources to us against him they will go away.
19 -BRAVO What get me is how much money they spend trying to shut him up. Is there no crime being committed in freddy town?? People should be out there following the police around all day see why they do what they do to Charles. How much has the Capital of NB spent on Charles?? I w.ant to know. That money could be spent on crime no harasement
20- Actually what they are doing to Charles is anything new. When you challenge authority, authority will do everything in its power to be perceived as the authority. It doesn't matter if its a police, a church, a Boss.
For now, in theWestern World. we see ourselves as a little more civilised than some other countries where someone like Charles would mysteriously disappear. Here how it is normally handled is that the person is denied employment or dismissed from their job which is a very powerful control mechanism to guarantee conformity to the elites objectives.
Since Charles is not employed they cannot control him. Unless he leaves the province or is away for an extended time would he loose his monthly check and subsidised housing.
This is speculation, but I think the reason why they are attempting to pursue the criminal avenue with section 300 is that to get a conviction they don't have to show any damage to their reputation, whereas in a civil case they would have to show that as a consequence his commentaries, they lost their job, or lost opportunities from what he published. In civil court, the amount of dollars and cents is determined from the damages that the plaintiff suffered. The other motive is that if they are successful at getting a conviction the judge may render a lengthy sentence which would mean Charles would lose his housing and income.
For a guy on "Welfare", he has access to people in high places. I don't think that there is a politician in New Brunswick who doesn't know Charles on a first name base. Old Leblanc must be doing something right ...
21- I believe there would be hell to pay should the city or police try putting Charles in jail...surely the good folks of Frederiction would make ALOT OF NOISE.
ABUSE at it's finest by those who are suppose to serve and protect...mockery of justice...
22- the thing is they are trying to get him put in jail on a trumped up charge and a sentence of 5 years as opposed to 2 years under the code of 301.
23- Well they tried with 301, but 301 was struck down by the appeals court in several provinces. The appeals court found that 301 was in contravention of the charter of rights. outside of the sentencing, the difference between 301 and 300 is. under 301 one you could say something that was true about a person yet you could still be liable under that section.
The courts ruled that 301 contravened the freedom of speech because it prevents one from making comments, about anyone, politicians, corporate heads and so on even if the comments are factual so it is for this reason that the upper courts struck down 301.
While I can understand why those officers who were called pedos, would be pissed off, but no one took the pedo comments seriously, so therefore no harm was made to the officer's reputation.
anecdotally I was told that one officer told one of the officers to whom the pedo comment directed to, "to basically suck it up" and going on with business rather than dwell on it.
24- Further more, defamatory libel is a civil suit, is my understanding, which the officers who feel they have been defamed should have to retain a lawyer. So my question is, why is the whole darn police station after him?
Or is this how police work, and are they unionized, could be another reason?
25- Your correct defamatory libel is a tort as well. It is quite common that a criminal offence can also be a civil action. Eig, One is all liquored up, drives a vehicle, kills someone. The criminal charges, impaired driving and culpable homicide. The person's family can know take a civil lawsuit against the defendant for the death of their loved one. Civil laws suites, monetary awards is issued for the specific damage, general damage and punitive damage.
The problem for the officers with a civil action is that they can't show that Charles comments cause any damage, however, if they were fired for his comments then they would have a claim for damages. The best that they could sue Charles would be for punitory reason, which in a likely hood the court would award nominal damages. So the cost of litigation for either the individual officers or the Union would be grossly disproportional the award. Civil suits are all about the money.
The challenge for Charles with section 300, is the black and white definition of defamatory libel section 298 and 299 of the criminal code.
When the crown considers to pursue on a criminal action on the offence there are several considerations that they have to take in, the offence, the facts and is for the public interests to pursue the action. In Charles case, I can't see how the crown would conclude that it would serve public interests to go forward. So fingers crossed that the crown decides not to proceed.
Lawyers love Charles, that how they a afford the lifestyle that lawyers enjoy if it wasn't for people like Charles they be on social assistance .. lol
26-Most likely a family member of the police who BOTCHED their illegal arrest of Charles and BOTCHED a warrant that was also illegal to gain access to Charles's computer, so yah, take a hike, loser.
27- WHAT do the pollytickers have to hide in Freddy town??
28- don't know , but this story gets more shadier, the more I read...
29- Keep up the great work Charles
30 - Nothing wrong with having a hobby, maybe anonymous coward should take notes and follow the KPMG/CRA amnesty secret deal. Canada has a Two Tiered Canada Revenue Tax Collection System.( Canada has a tax system for the Rich and a different Tax System for the poor) Truth.
We're talking millions and millions of tax dollars lost. But nah, let's pick on those at the bottom of the totem pole, because we're so gawd damn ignorant to REAL FACTS, kinda makes the HATER look awfully foolish/stupid, in my books.
31 - WOW is this pick on Charles week ? Charles does what does to occupy his mind and the fact the Liberal Party of New Brunswick in power at the time caused him his job ,this after being dismissed by Irving cause his has ADHD. So good for Charles for being a pain in the ASS to Politicians , Police and anyone else in power.
32- Good one !! Public safe !!! Lmao. The video i have seen !! It was the police attack him .
33- I caught on right away, lol.
34- Blah , leave Charles alone and attack some real issues, Like job loss, homelessness, lack of Mental Health |Care, Carbon tax, and that is the short list,
35- don't let the nasty slime balls knock you off your mission! You have a lot of supporters. Stomp on the malicious note.. Or put it in a safe place as evidence.. Just don't ruminate. Want coffee some day soon??
36- Gutless creature & a coward how dare he/she be such an ass. Think you might nee some time away to rethink your attitude!!
37 - Dont have much use for anyone complaning and not having the nuts to sign their name.
No comments:
Post a Comment