Saturday, 23 August 2014

Fredericton’s Chief Administrative Officer Chris MacPherson blasted Blogger with lies!!!

11 comments:

  1. I didn't hear any lies. You of course wouldn't admit to getting email asking you to stop, but he had them there so why didn't you look at them. This the same attitude you had the last time and will continue.

    ReplyDelete
  2. How long is it going to take before you start bullying and harassing again? Now you target is Chris MacPherson. You claim to be very hurt by the dishonest police charge, but you behaviour has been much worse really. You went public. We would never have known about this, if you hadn't posted it. You could have and should have dealt with it through appropriate channels, but that is not your style. You prefer to harass and abuse rather than take mature, productive action. You had the attitude of "See what I can get away with." Well that's over now. We'll see if you have learned anything, They can also shut you down again. I can't wait until the cyberbullying law is passed in NB. You are also full of fantasy if you think the provincial election was a factor. You have a much better impression of yourself than others do. What makes you think with all the garbage and lies on this that is not in anyway credible, would affect an election?

    ReplyDelete
  3. Interesting how the 'experts' seem to know everything about everything. Whether they asked him to stop is irrelevant, although it certainly does back up their claim. I asked him to stop, LOTS of people asked him to stop, that really isn't the issue.

    Only part of the issue is charles. Its true that what the police did wasn't 'public', but so what? If that had been you then you'd sing a different tune. The police did all this and absolutely nothing happened, nobody was reprimanded (that we know of), nobody was disciplined.

    Charles is a crazy guy with a crazy blog-there are MILLIONS of them out there. If you don't like it, don't look at it. What he shows is exactly what is wrong with the system-police can do what they want, make all the 'mistakes' they want, and there are no consequences. Thats how dictatorships function, just the IDEA that people are berating charles instead of the police shows just how few human rights canadians have.

    As for the election, thats hardly fantasy, you're delusional if you think ANYTHING political happens without a reason. Maybe its true that it simply took google this long to look at the issue, but Charles has been doing this for a LONG time. So why didn't this happen a year ago?

    This looks like a very close election, which means all bets are off. If you think charles blog is irrelevant then you are nuts. Charles hits, like most media, always goes up during times of protest and elections. And charles is almost literally the ONLY place for political coverage outside the lousy coverage of cbc and irving. For the two, even three other parties, its almost the only outreach they have.

    But that just brings to mind why the city is being stupid. First, email addresses are free, charles can keep setting up blogs til the cows come home. Second, nobody in their right mind believed the 'garbage' and 'lies' that charles was stating about policy, and third, it shows that the city really has very little on its plate that it is bothering with this stuff. I doubt ANY blogger in the western world gets the kind of interest from local authorities that Charles does. All this action does is make people think 'police state', and the number of cases which have been introduced by charles and then verified by third parties shows that there is more than one reason Charles is watched.

    Its interesting though that in the above its charles, a lone guy with a little blog than nobody has to look at is doing the 'bullying', while the government and institutions which have arrested him continuously for years are considered 'the victims'. That's actually pretty funny and shows that charles isn't the only guy capable of writing 'garbage'.

    But I suppose like the Fredericton city councillor said, 'thats not something I know anything about".

    ReplyDelete
  4. Very well said Mikel

    Not long ago Charles had a nice relationship with the Fredericton police force and he was even buddy buddy with a bunch of them.
    What changed all this?
    Charles made the mistake of video taping a few of the Fredericton police forces finest beating the crap out of a defenseless Canadian soldier.
    Right there the crap started to happen.
    Until then Charles was viewed as Fredericton media and all the cops would gladly talk to him.
    As soon as the video Charles took went public he wasn't considered media and was the Fredericton police forces #1 enemy.
    They harassed him a bunch of times and they even stopped him to give him a fine for riding a bike either on the sidewalk or without a helmet...I don't remember witch. Charles has posted a shitload of others doing the same while the fpd were looking on and nothing was ever done.
    Charles then exposed the abuse that that pore Wombat women went through and is still going through because of the crooked fpd abuse.
    Then the fpd were really out to get Charles .....hmmm how can we stop Charles from exposing all of the corrupt things we do??? so they wanted to raid his place and seize his computer thinking ....hey..if we seize his computer then the welfare bum wont have anyway of exposing all of the corrupt things we do and he wont be able to afford to buy a other computer.
    Wrong because Charles has lots of followers that will donate a computer so he can keep blogging.
    So the fpd decided that the only way they can get a search warrant was to go to his internet provider and LIE TO THEM saying....hey! this guy is in child porn and we need to shut him down, we need his ip address and need to know every where this guy went on the internet.
    So they raided Charles place and took everything computer related he had in his place.
    Charles is finished they thought....yayyyy
    Wrong.
    Charles was back online with a new donated computer in a few days
    It was proven that Charles was not into child porn and all of there bull shit charged against him were dropped.
    This is just a fraction of the crap charles has went through.
    If they had any clue who they were dealing with they would back off and make peace with him.
    In his 20s and 30s Charles would fight with his fists.
    if he lost a fight he would fight the guy again and again until he won.
    Now days he fights with words and if they think they can shut him up then there dreaming.
    The more you push Charles the more he will fight back.
    If they had any brains they would just let him be and do his thing

    Charles, why not get a off shore server that way you can say and do what ever you want and no one can ever shut you down.
    $50 a year is all it cost.

    --maurice the homeless guy--

    ReplyDelete
  5. Mikel You're as bad as Charles. First he is very relevant and is the only real media then nobody believes the garbage and lies his is posting.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Maurice is pretty darn savvy.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Charles posts dozens of blog postings every day. When he calls the cops names, everybody knows WHY. And everybody knows that its pretty very likely not true (although ANYBODY 'could' be).

    The election is another matter entirely and has nothing to do with his gripes against the police. When he interviews politicians that has nothing to do with his gripes against the police, he is just providing a voice for them, which the public wouldn't otherwise see. He is also one of the only places where people can actually comment. Irving has all information behind a pay wall, while CBC is pretty selective in their stories, and even more selective in what they allow comments on-and whether they print them at all.

    So Charles is by far the most 'open' media during an election. When he talks about cops, people know to either disregard it, or take it with a pretty huge chunk of salt. But that is only a tiny percentage of what charles does. Clear enough for you?

    ReplyDelete
  8. That was a good summary above, but it should be pointed out that its not the case that Fredericton police are somehow 'worse' than other forces. These are institutional problems, the main one here being that police police themselves. Other provinces have separate civilian bodies which are by no means perfect, but better than NB. Just the other day there was another report out of Saint John that RCMP investigated a police killing and said everything was kosher.

    Unfortunately, Charles just does a bad job of highlighting the institutional changes necessary-or even the problems. Charles problems began before Fredericton when he was arrested by the Saint John police for taking photos at the Atlantica business conference. At that point not only was he hauled to the ground and arrested, but his camera was taken and all his photos deleted.

    This case went to trial before the judge threw it out and called the arresting police officer a liar who lied under oath. And once again nothing was done to that officer, and no apologies were made to Charles.

    So anybody that thinks Charles is the bad guy in this scenario might want to watch a few of the media specials going on right now about the militarization of police. Its not just going on in the states, as any native or person in Kent County can tell you. These are institutional problems which were formerly associated with dictatorships but are now being seen more often in Canada-although they've certainly always been around.

    Now we've got Stephen Harper using Canada Revenue agency to 'target' charities who dare oppose them, and police forces dressing in military gear to attack peaceful protests, and in this corner, city officials closing off a blog because the blogger says not nice things about them. Once again New Brunswick can proudly show off its colours that it has the worst human rights record in the country. Good show!

    ReplyDelete
  9. First of all you can't properly interview, a politician or otherwise, by starting with "What to you think of the racist pigs, I mean cops?" Or you can't continually accost someone on the street to whine about bike helmets and still be considered credible and appropriate. There is always an agenda with Charles, so no other voice is heard.

    Further to Maurice the homeless guy. If this blog is to be cleaned up and considered credible, Charles should not post insults about other people. Calling the Wambolts Wambats is cruel and bullying behaviour and should not be posted. Maurice is neither homeless nor a poor speller. He knows exactly what he is doing. All people should be treated with respect and that includes Charles.

    ReplyDelete
  10. The blog went well past not nice things. It was cruel and harassing and stalking. Charles stalked some officers for a picture. I am no fan of the FPD and feel much should be done to improve it but trying to take the offensive and not admitting that it was way over the line in an obsessive manner is just not taking responsibility and continuing a war like agenda.

    ReplyDelete
  11. well it all about closing the blog before the election ... since the blog brought done the liberals at the last election ...by blogging the sell of nb power .. they are afraid it will bring down the conservative by his blogging of the cops and the fracking

    ReplyDelete